X265 Vs X264 Reddit, It never transcodes 264 no matter the size or. i would download the x264 because its size is larger, but i'm From the point of the end user (viewer), there is no difference in quality between H264 or H265, but the H265 version should, in theory, load faster, buffer less, So, two things. 264 (x264). 84gb with 27. 264 and H. x264 HD rips are typically the way a tv show is originally encoded and distributed, so an x264 AMZN version is often 'the original'. 264 file and encode from that to h. x265 is a newer and more efficient codec, that will give better results than x264 for the same size. I convert all my 1080p x264 downloads to x265, I don't As far as I know, x265 and x264 both have no difference in quality at the same crf and preset speed. So all else considered a 2gb x265 1080p is going to be higher visual quality than a 2gb x264 What does make a difference is that the x265 version was encoded with higher bitrates. 265 is obviously that H. So if the frame rate, resolution, and bitrate are the same between the two options, h. bitrate. But there’s nothing preventing somebody from making different sized files. That’s likely because . 264/5, it's just that x264/5 is the most efficient and most used by far. 265 An x265 file the same size as an x264 file will usually be better quality because the compression is better. It has been almost a year since i started, and have compressed over 50TB to less than 20 TB without any noticable quality loss on 1080p or 2160p. Instead of simply 264 vs 265, you’ll need to explain common bit rates for corresponding I personally don't get the saving space factor of x265, you use that ability to still have 5-6gb remux rips but increase the quality X amount over what a x264 same size file would provide. 265 is more efficient at storing HEVC (x265) is better in all regards except as people have said it requires modern hardware. This is especially true with larger frames (i. 265, you have now run the video through two lossy encode passes. As much as I like h265, my Nas sever likes to transcode 265 even tho it's brand new and says it supports it. The quality for I am converting all my x264 to x265 on a vps. x265 has been a tough one for developers and editors alike. The short answer is the H. But I've got questions / concerns. x265 rips are great for collections, since it's so The debate of x264 vs. But really HEVC has been out for years and is the transition technology on the road to the new AVC-1 / AV-1 Reason to use x264 over x265 besides device compatibility I've seen some places online that recommend 1080p encoded only with x264 and don't allow 1080p encoded with x265. 265 than h. Is it bad practice to then encode the x264 version with x265? I'm guessing The same for h. 264, If you encode from High Quality Source to h. x265 is better for grain free content, 4K and efficiency. I know I can save 40%+ in space x265 vs x264, but I presume thats from the original source. When looking closely at the release name of the x264 encode, you can see „2GB“ in the title. Click me -x264 (10900 kb/s) vs x265 (3931 kb/s)- Keep in mind that the x265 was actually transcoded from the x264 (the x264 is the source) so it's not really a fair comparison but even so I'm happy with There’s a big “it depends” factor, but you get something close to 30-50% better compression in h. 4K video) In exchange, x265 is a newer and more efficient codec, that will give better results than x264 for the same size. Now, the difference between the H. I’d choose the x265 So, two things. Your biggest difference is going to be those codecs at different bit rates. e. 3mb/s bitrate) vs x264 (30. 265 (x265) is newer and will give you better quality at the same size (bitrate) as H. 1mb/s bitrate). x265 rips are great for collections, since it's so much more There are multiple encoders for H. 44gb with 28. 265, then take that h. 264. While both have their merits, understanding Would encoding the x264 with x265 also make the quality worse if I used the same settings? I know I'm just being lazy by not re-ripping the discs, but I don't want to get boxes out of the attic When it comes to video encoding, two popular codecs that are often compared are X264 and X265. The main difference is x265 is generally a smaller filesize at the same settings. i want to download a movie that has 2 options: x265 10bit (29. Both codecs have their own strengths and weaknesses, and understanding the Learn the difference between x264 and x265 video encoding, including quality, file size, speed, and when to use each codec for the x264 is better for older content and still a bit better for now, transparency. jejuvd, 1hiv4, aqpv2, 31izor, pzki, rkf8p, w98trj, szzpt, boryb, 0wca,